There does not seem to be much consistency in how public officials are treated: some get rewarded with gongs, others get the boot, often dependent on how the media story plays out.
Perhaps the system of awarding honours is at fault. Would a peerage, say, be appropriate for:
- an intelligence officer overseeing a flawed national security issues;
- a City fat cat nursing a huge annual bonus;
- a civil servant caught up exclusively in party political services?
Maybe discrete in-house retirement gifts for controversial recipients would be less likely to attract negative media attention.
No comments:
Post a Comment